Search AI Products and News

AI company Anthropic recently updated its "responsible scaling" policy, outlining which models require additional safety protections. This move aims to mitigate potential risks before new technologies are released. According to Anthropic's blog, if stress testing reveals an AI model could assist a "resource-constrained state actor" in developing chemical and biological weapons, Anthropic will delay the technology's public launch.

Recently, Nvidia announced the addition of three safety features on its NeMo Guardrails platform, aimed at helping businesses better manage and control AI chatbots. These microservices target common challenges in AI safety and content moderation, offering a range of practical solutions. Among them, the Content Safety service can review content before the AI responds to users, detecting any potential harmful information. This service helps prevent...

Recently, OpenAI showcased its more proactive red team testing strategy in the field of AI safety, surpassing its competitors, especially in the critical areas of multi-step reinforcement learning and external red team testing. The two papers released by the company establish new industry standards for enhancing the quality, reliability, and safety of AI models. The first paper, 'OpenAI's AI Model and System External Red Team Testing Methodology,' highlights the effectiveness of specialized external teams in identifying security vulnerabilities that internal testing may overlook. These external teams consist of cyber...

Mindgard has announced the completion of $8 million in funding aimed at accelerating its research and development efforts and expanding its presence in the U.S. market. The financing round was led by .406Ventures, with participation from Atlantic Bridge, Willowtree Investments, and existing investors IQ Capital and Lakestar. Additionally, Mindgard has appointed two industry leaders to take on the roles of Head of Product and Head of Marketing.

French AI startup Mistral AI has officially launched a new content moderation API aimed at competing with OpenAI and other industry leaders, while addressing the growing concerns around AI safety and content filtering. This service is based on Mistral's Ministral8B model, finely tuned to detect potential harmful content across nine different categories, including pornography, hate speech, violence, dangerous activities, and personally identifiable information.

Recently, U.S. officials announced that a global Artificial Intelligence (AI) Safety Summit will be hosted in San Francisco in November. As AI technology advances rapidly, governments around the world are striving to keep pace with this change. The summit will be co-chaired by U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and is scheduled for November 20-21. Raimondo stated in a release, 'As AI develops rapidly, we are doing everything we can.' She noted the importance of close international collaboration and thoughtful coordination.

Recently, OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman announced his decision to leave the company's internal safety committee, which was established in May of this year to oversee key safety and security decisions in the development and deployment of OpenAI's AI models. Altman's decision has drawn significant attention as he hopes to hand this role over to third-party experts to enhance transparency, collaboration, and security. With Altman's departure, this safety committee will transform into an 'independent oversight committee' focused on safety and security issues.

The United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union have jointly signed the first legally binding AI treaty, the 'AI Framework Convention', aimed at ensuring that AI applications adhere to principles of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. The treaty requires signatory countries to follow principles that protect user data, respect the law, and operate transparently, implementing these principles through legislation and administrative measures. Although compliance with the treaty primarily relies on monitoring, and enforcement may be weak, it is seen as an important blueprint for countries to formulate AI laws. Currently, the US, EU, UK, and several other countries have signed, and the treaty will come into force in five...

California lawmakers have passed the SB1047 bill aimed at ensuring AI safety, which is set to be signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. The bill requires AI models with training costs exceeding $100 million to undergo safety testing before release and establishes an emergency stop function in case of accidents. It also mandates reporting to the California Attorney General within 72 hours of an incident and establishes a 'Cutting-edge Model Bureau' to oversee compliance, with substantial fines for violators. This initiative aims to prevent AI misuse, ensure safety, and has garnered support from notable figures in the AI field. However, tech giants have had mixed reactions.

Musk publicly supports California's SB1047 bill, which aims to require large AI model manufacturers to implement safeguards against potential harms. The bill mandates documentation of strategies to prevent serious damage caused by AI. Musk underscores the necessity of AI regulation, consistent with his past concerns about AI risks. His AI company, xAI, will be bound by the SB1047 bill. In contrast, OpenAI opposes the SB1047 bill and supports an alternative proposal. This event highlights the complexity and controversy of AI regulation within the industry.

Musk supports California's SB1047 bill, which requires large AI model development companies to document safety measures to prevent models from causing serious harm. He emphasized that he has always advocated for AI regulation, believing it should be treated like the regulation of risky products and technologies. Musk's company xAI will be bound by this law, even though he plans to leave California. In contrast, OpenAI openly opposes SB1047 and supports an alternative bill. Adobe and Microsoft, on the other hand, support another new California bill AB3211, which requires labeling of AI-generated content. These developments highlight the dynamic landscape of AI regulation.

OpenAI and several tech companies oppose a California bill aimed at ensuring the safety and transparency of artificial intelligence, fearing that it will hinder innovation and development in AI technology, potentially leading to an outflow of the industry. OpenAI stated in a press release that overly strict regulations could stifle the creativity of developers and researchers, limiting exploration and experimentation. They emphasized that technological innovation requires flexibility rather than being constrained by legal limitations. OpenAI hopes to engage in dialogue with lawmakers to promote a more reasonable legal framework that aligns with industry development trends. If the bill passes, it could lead to...